Photozs updated in DR12, unchanged in DR13 or DR14
GalaxyTagview in the CAS). This version features a greatly expanded training set, an updated method of template fitting and a more detailed approach to errors. As opposed to previous releases, we only provide the results of one estimation technique, and they are contained in the
Photoztable and the
PhotozErrorMaptable in the CAS. This page summarizes the methods used to calculate the photometric redshift estimates, with further details available in Beck et al. (2016).
The estimation method is the same as the one used in Data Release 10; following the name used in Csabai et al. (2007), we refer to it as a kd-tree nearest neighbor fit (KF). The KF estimates are stored in the
Photoz table in the CAS.
The method is empirical in the sense that it uses a training set as a reference, then applies a machine learning technique to estimate redshifts. The training set contains photometric and spectroscopic observations for galaxies. We have chosen this approach – as opposed to template fitting methods – because of the machine learning techniques’ higher overall precision. The second estimation method was dropped because we have found that the main limiting factor in the accuracy of the results is the composition and photometric errors of the training set, not the choice of machine learning technique.
To infer values of physical parameters of galaxies, such as k-corrections, spectral type, and rest frame colors, we extend the KF method with a conservative method of template fitting. We determined the best-fitting template via a minimum chi-square fit to the photometric magnitudes, using the composite spectral template atlas of Dobos et al. (2012). The photometric errors were calculated using the prescriptions of Scranton et al. (2005).
The previous method used in Data Release 10 calculated a non-negative linear combination (NNLS) of spectral model templates. While this method is more sophisticated, it is prone to overfitting, and it also allows non-physical spectral solutions, which is especially a problem in cases where the photometric errors are underestimated. The current method is limited by the number and coverage of templates used, but it avoids the aforementioned issues.
Training set overview
The training set is made up of three main subsets. The first two are extracted from the DR12 spectroscopic catalog: the main galaxy sample, containing more than 830,000 galaxies (average r magnitude: 17.3, average redshift: 0.15, extending to 0.5), and the BOSS sample, comprised of over 1,060,000 galaxies (average r: 19.7, average redshift: 0.45, extending to 0.8). We also matched results from nine public spectroscopic redshift surveys to SDSS photometry, yielding 76,000 additional galaxies in the third set (average r: 19.1, average redshift: 0.25, extending to 0.8). We applied cuts in the photometric color space and errors to ensure higher accuracy, but at the same time greatly limiting the size and redshift coverage of the third subset. The RMS of the estimation errors for the three parts of the training set are 0.029, 0.050 and 0.070, respectively. Fainter objects generally have significantly higher photometric errors, which results in them having larger errors in redshift estimation, too.
Error fields and flags
The error statistics of the reference set are only good indicators of the error of the estimated redshifts when the objects to be estimated follow the same distribution in colour space and have the same photometric error properties as the training set. The KF method provides an explicit estimate of the redshift errors (zErr), and we have found this estimate to be reliable and unbiased if these assumptions hold.
The new flag field
photoErrorClass in the
Photoz table divides the galaxies into 7 categories based on their photometric errors, 1 being the best and matching the limits of the training set, 2 being somewhat worse, and so on until 7, the worst. Also, the sign of the
photoErrorClass field shows whether the estimated galaxy is within the bounding box of its k nearest neighbors: negative if outside (meaning that we extrapolate), positive if inside the bounding box (we interpolate). The following table shows the average RMS for different
photoErrorClass values, calculated for all galaxies with available redshifts.
The redshift error (zErr) values in the
Photoz table are only valid estimates for
photoErrorClass 1. For other error classes, the additional statistical error needs to be taken into account, however, it is highly dependent on the location in color and magnitude space. We recommend using
photoErrorClass 1 (and perhaps -1, 2 and 3, at the most), with additional filtering based on the zErr values.
We added the table
PhotozErrorMap, which provides supporting information regarding the error-dependence in color space, based on the training set. It shows the average actual RMS, the average error estimate, the average of the standard deviation of the k nearest neighbours, the average photometric and spectroscopic redshift, and the number of galaxies in the training set, for a grid in r magnitude, and g-r, r-i colors. This table can be used to pinpoint regions with poor training set coverage, and with bad error estimates.
The KF method provides some additional parameters that can be useful for quality assurance. For each galaxy in the
Photoz table, nnCount is the number of nearest neighbors, after removing outliers. A value much smaller than 100 indicates poor training set coverage for that galaxy. Similarly, the parameter nnVol (the volume of the bounding box) warns if the reference set is only very sparsely populated around that galaxy. Although the spectroscopic redshift of the nearest object (nnSpecz) and the average nearest neighbor redshift (nnAvgZ) are not as good estimators as the fitted redshift (z), significantly different values might indicate large errors. Note that in all the related tables instead of NULL values we use the large negative value of -9999 to indicate that the estimation was not possible for some reason, or that data is not available.
Template fitting details
After the photometric redshift of each galaxy is determined, template fitting is used to estimate the galaxy’s k-correction, distance modulus, absolute magnitudes, rest frame colors, and spectral type. We consider the templates at the fixed redshift given by the KF estimator. Where applicable, – to match what is used elsewhere in SkyServer/CasJobs – Omega=0.2739, Lambda=0.726, h=0.705 cosmology was assumed, where the unit of the luminosity distance is Mpc. The chisq and rnorm values indicate the quality of the minimum chi-square fit, and bestFitTemplateID identifies the spectral template giving the best fit. Note that bestFitTemplateID=0 indicates a failed fit. The empirical spectral templates described in Dobos et al. (2012) were used, and the following table shows the bestFitTemplateID values with the corresponding names from the library (http://www.vo.elte.hu/compositeatlas).
Two examples of how to query photometric redshifts in DR12 data are shown in SkyServer at Sample Queries: Photometric Redshifts.
External survey data
The following table references the spectroscopic redshift surveys that we used to extend the training set.
|2dF||Colless et al. (2001), Colless et al. (2003)||http://magnum.anu.edu.au/~TDFgg/|
|6dF||Jones et al. (2004), Jones et al. (2009)||http://www.6dfgs.net/|
|DEEP2||Davis et al. (2003), Newman et al. (2013)||http://deep.ps.uci.edu/|
|GAMA||Driver et al. (2011), Baldry et al. (2014)||http://www.gama-survey.org/|
|PRIMUS||Coil et al. (2011), Cool et al. (2013)||http://primus.ucsd.edu/|
|VIPERS||Garilli et al. (2014), Guzzo et al. (2014)||http://vipers.inaf.it/|
|VVDS||Le Fèvre et al. (2004), Garilli et al. (2008)||http://cesam.oamp.fr/vvdsproject/vvds.htm|
|WiggleZ||Drinkwater et al. (2010), Parkinson et al. (2012)||http://wigglez.swin.edu.au/site/|
|zCOSMOS||Lilly et al. (2007), Lilly et al. (2009)||http://www.astro.ethz.ch/lilly/research/zcosmos.html|