Legacy Survey Target Selection
- An object can be targeted simultaneously by more than one algorithm (that is, have any combination of bits set).
- Unlike DR7 and earlier, the photometric catalogs do not contain target selection flags; the target selection flags are only stored in the tiling and spectroscopic tables.
- Target selection flags for spectroscopic objects were based on the photometric reductions available at the time, as well as a particular version of the target selection software (which evolved somewhat during the survey: slightly for galaxies, dramatically for QSOs).
This page provides short summaries of the various target selection algorithms used in the SDSS-I and SDSS-II Legacy Survey. These target flags are relevant for any plate in the survey
sdss and program name
Main Galaxy Sample
Galaxy targets are selected starting from objects which are detected in the r band (i.e. those objects which are more than 5σ above sky after smoothing with a PSF filter). The photometry is corrected for Galactic extinction using the reddening maps of Schlegel, Finkbeiner & Davis (1998). Galaxies targeted from DR2 and later data are separated from stars using the following cut on the difference between the r-band PSF and cmodel magnitudes:
rPSF - rcmodel >= 0.24
Note that this cut is more conservative for galaxies than the star-galaxy separation cut used by Photo (galaxies targeted off DR1 data used a slightly different cut, rPSF – rmodel >= 0.3). Potential targets are then rejected if they have been flagged by Photo as SATURATED, BRIGHT, or (BLENDED and not NODEBLEND) – see the descriptions of flags. The Petrosian magnitude limit rP = 17.77 is then applied, which results in a main galaxy sample surface density of about 90 per deg2.
A number of surface brightness cuts are then applied, based on μ50, the mean surface brightness within the Petrosian half-light radius petroR50. The most significant cut is μ50 <= 23.0 mag arcsec-2 in r, which already includes 99% of the galaxies brighter than the Petrosian magnitude limit. At surface brightnesses in the range 23.0 <= μ50 <= 24.5 mag arcsec-2, several other criteria are applied in order to reject most spurious targets, as shown in the flowchart. Please see the detailed discussion of these surface brightness cuts, including consideration of selection effects, in Section 4.4 of Strauss et al. (2002). Finally, in order to reject very bright objects which will cause contamination of the spectra of adjacent fibers and/or saturation of the spectroscopic CCDs, objects are rejected if they have (1) fiber magnitudes brighter than 15.0 in g or r, or 14.5 in i; or (2) Petrosian magnitude rP < 15.0 and Petrosian half-light radius petroR50 < 2 arcsec.
Main galaxy targets satisfying all of the above criteria have the GALAXY bit set in their primTarget flag. Among those, the ones with μ50 >= 23.0 mag arcsec-2 have the GALAXY_BIG bit set. Galaxy targets who fail all the surface brightness selection limits but have r band fiber magnitudes brighter than 19 are accepted anyway (since they are likely to yield a good spectrum) and have the GALAXY_BRIGHT_CORE bit set.
Luminous Red Galaxies
Primary LRG Selection
SDSS luminous red galaxies (LRGs) are selected on the basis of color and magnitude to yield a sample of luminous intrinsically red galaxies that extends fainter and farther than the SDSS main galaxy sample. Please see Eisenstein et al. (2001) for detailed discussions of sample selection, efficiency, use, and caveats.
LRGs are selected using a variant of the photometric redshift technique and are meant to comprise a uniform, approximately volume-limited sample of objects with the reddest colors in the rest frame. The sample is selected via cuts in the (g–r, r–i, r) color-color-magnitude cube. Note that all colors are measured using model magnitudes, and all quantities are corrected for Galactic extinction following Schlegel, Finkbeiner & Davis (1998).
Objects must be detected by Photo as
BINNED1 OR BINNED2 OR BINNED4 (see flag descriptions) in both r and i, but not necessarily in g, and objects flagged by Photo as
SATURATED in g, r, or i are excluded.
The galaxy model colors are rotated first to a basis that is aligned with the galaxy locus in the (g–r, r–i) plane according to:
c⊥ = (r–i) – (g–r)/4 – 0.18
c|| = 0.7(g–r) + 1.2[(r–i) – 0.18]
Please note that some earlier versions of SDSS documentation (notably among them this page and the print version of the EDR paper) have incorrect signs in the definition of cperp; the above with just minus signs are now correct, as are those in the LRG target selection paper (referenced below).
Because the 4000 Å break moves from the g band to the r band at a redshift z ~ 0.4, two separate sets of selection criteria are needed to target LRGs below and above that redshift:
Cut I for z <~ 0.4
- rPetro < 13.1 + c|| / 0.3
- rPetro < 19.2
- |c⊥| < 0.2
- μ50 < 24.2 mag arcsec-2
- rPSF – rmodel > 0.3
Cut II for z >~ 0.4
- rPetro < 19.5
- c⊥ > 0.45 – (g–r)/6
- g–r > 1.30 + 0.25(r–i)
- μ50 < 24.2 mag arcsec-2
- rPSF – rmodel > 0.5
Cut I selection results in an approximately volume-limited LRG sample to z=0.38, with additional galaxies to z ~ 0.45. Cut II selection adds yet more luminous red galaxies to z ~ 0.55. The two cuts together result in about 12 LRG targets per deg2 that are not already in the main galaxy sample (about 10 in Cut I, 2 in Cut II).
In primTarget, GALAXY_RED is set if the LRG passes either Cut I or Cut II. GALAXY_RED_II is set if the object passes Cut II but not Cut I. However, neither of these flags is set if the LRG is brighter than the main galaxy sample flux limit but failed to enter the main sample (e.g., because of the main sample surface brightness cuts). Thus LRG target selection never overrules main sample target selection on bright objects.
Changes in LRG target selection for DR2 and later data
With the change in the model magnitude code between DR1 and DR2/DR3 data (see improvements to image processing in DR2), the mean g-r and r-i model colors of galaxies have shifted by about 0.005 magnitudes. Because the LRG is very sensitive to color, this would have increased the number density of targets by about 10%. Instead, we shifted the LRG color cuts to compensate; in addition, improved star-galaxy separation allows tighter cuts on the
model-PSF quantity by which stars are rejected. Here we give the updated equations for Cut I applied to data reduced with the DR2/DR3 version of the photometric pipeline (5_4; criteria not listed here are taken over unchanged from above):
The definition of the new color basis changes as follows:
- c⊥ = (r–i) – (g–r)/4 – 0.177
- c|| = 0.7(g–r) + 1.2[(r–i) – 0.177]
Cut I for z <~ 0.4 becomes
- rPetro < 13.116 + c|| / 0.3
- rPSF – rmodel >= 0.24
Cut II for z >~ 0.4 becomes
- c⊥ > 0.449 – (g-r)/6
- g-r > 1.296 + 0.25 (r-i)
- rPSF – rmodel >= 0.4
This new version of LRG target selection is applied to the
best region of sky reduced with the latest version of the imaging pipeline. It is of course not applied retroactively to the
target version of the sky, which used older versions of the pipeline.
Due to other subtle differences in the photometric pipeline and the calibration, these changes will not exactly reproduce the selection criteria actually used when spectroscopy was carried out. Indeed, defining an LRG sample based on the
best reductions will result in large spectroscopic incompleteness because so many objects are close to the boundaries. Instead, one should use the
target photometry and adjust the calibrations of that relative to the
best calibration. Of course, if one is interested in photometric properties of single objects, then we recommend the
The final adopted SDSS quasar target selection algorithm is described in Richards et al. (2002). However, it should be noted that the implementation of this algorithm came after the last date of DR1 spectroscopy. Thus this paper does not technically describe the DR1 quasar sample and the DR1 quasar sample is not intended to be used for statistical purposes (but see below). Interested parties are instead encouraged to use the catalog of DR1 quasars that is being prepared by Schneider et al (2003, in prep.), which will include an indication of which quasars were also selected by the Richards et al. (2002) algorithm. At some later time, we will also perform an analysis of those objects selected by the new algorithm but for which we do not currently have spectroscopy and will produce a new sample that is suitable for statistical analysis.
Though the DR1 quasars were not technically selected with the Richards et al. (2002) algorithm, the algorithms used since the EDR are quite similar to this algorithm and this paper suffices to describe the general considerations that were made in selecting quasars. Thus it is worth describing the algorithm in more detail.
The quasar target selection algorithms are summarized in this schematic flowchart. Because the quasar selection cuts are fairly numerous and detailed, the reader is strongly recommended to refer to Richards et al. (2002) for the full discussion of the sample selection criteria, completeness, target efficiency, and caveats.
The quasar target selection algorithm primarily identifies quasars as outliers from the stellar locus, modeled following Newberg & Yanny (1997) as elongated tubes in the (u–g, g–r, r–i) (denoted ugri) and (g–r, r–i, i–z) (denoted griz) color cubes. In addition, targets are also selected by matches to the FIRST catalog of radio sources (Becker, White, & Helfand 1995). All magnitudes and colors are measured using PSF magnitudes, and all quantities are corrected for Galactic extinction following Schlegel, Finkbeiner, & Davis (1998). Objects flagged by Photo as having either “fatal” errors (primarily those flagged BRIGHT, SATURATED, EDGE, or BLENDED; see flag descriptions) or “nonfatal” errors (primarily related to deblending or interpolation problems) are rejected from the color selection, but only objects with fatal errors are rejected from the FIRST radio selection. See Section 3.2 of Richards et al. (2002) for the full details. Objects are also rejected (from the color selection, but not the radio selection) if they lie in any of 3 color-defined exclusion regions which are dominated by white dwarfs, A stars, and M star+white dwarf pairs; see Section 3.5.1 of Richards et al. (2002) for the specific exclusion region color boundaries. Such objects are flagged as QSO_REJECT. Quasar targets are further restricted to objects with iPSF > 15.0 in order to exclude bright objects which will cause contamination of the spectra from adjacent fibers. Objects which pass the above tests are then selected to be quasar targets if they lie more than 4σ from either the ugri or griz stellar locus. The detailed specification of the stellar loci and of the outlier rejection algorithm are provided in Appendices A and B of Richards et al. (2002). These color-selected quasar targets are divided into main (or low-redshift) and high-redshift samples, as follows:
Main Quasar Sample (QSO_CAP, QSO_SKIRT)
These are outliers from the ugri stellar locus and are selected in the magnitude range 15.0 < iPSF < 19.1. Both point sources and extended objects are included, except that extended objects must have colors that are far from the colors of the main galaxy distribution and that are consistent with the colors of AGNs; these additional color cuts for extended objects are specified in Section 3.4.4 of Richards et al. (2002). Even if an object is not a ugri stellar locus outlier, it may be selected as a main quasar sample target if it lies in either of these 2 “inclusion”regions: (1) “mid-z”, used to select 2.5 < z < 3 quasars whose colors cross the stellar locus in SDSS color space; and (2) “UVX”, used to duplicate selection of z <= 2.2 UV-excess quasars in previous surveys. These inclusion boxes are specified in Section 3.5.2 of Richards et al. (2002). Note that the QSO_CAP and QSO_SKIRT distinction is kept for historical reasons (as some data that are already public use this notation) and results from an original intent to use separate selection criteria in regions of low (“cap”) and high (“skirt”) stellar density. It turns out that the selection efficiency is indistinguishable in the cap and skirt regions, so that the target selection used is in fact identical in the 2 regions (similarly for QSO_FIRST_CAP and QSO_FIRST_SKIRT, below).
High-Redshift Quasar Sample (QSO_HIZ)
These are outliers from the griz stellar locus and are selected in the magnitude range 15.0 < iPSF < 20.2. Only point sources are selected, as these quasars will lie at redshifts above z~3.5 and are expected to be classified as stellar at SDSS resolution. Also, to avoid contamination from faint low-redshift quasars which are also griz stellar locus outliers, blue objects are rejected according to eq. (1) in Section 3.4.5 of Richards et al. (2002). Moreover, several additional color cuts are used in order to recover more high-redshift quasars than would be possible using only griz stellar locus outliers. So an object will be selected as a high-redshift quasar target if it lies in any of these 3 “inclusion” regions: (1) “gri high-z”, for z >= 3.6 quasars; (2) “riz high-z”, for z >= 4.5 quasars; and (3) “ugr red outlier”, for z >= 3.0 quasars. The specifics are given in eqs. (6-8) in Section 3.5.2 of Richards et al. (2002).
FIRST Sources (QSO_FIRST_CAP, QSO_FIRST_SKIRT)
Irrespective of the various color selection criteria above, SDSS stellar objects are selected as quasar targets if they have 15.0 < iPSF < 19.1 and are matched to within 2 arcsec of a counterpart in the FIRST radio catalog.
Finally, those targets which otherwise meet the color selection or radio selection criteria described above, but fail the cuts on iPSF, will be flagged as QSO_MAG_OUTLIER (also called QSO_FAINT). Such objects may be of interest for follow-up studies, but are not otherwise targeted for spectroscopy under routine operations (unless another “good” quasar target flag is set).
Other Science Targets
A variety of stars are also targeted using color selection criteria, as follows:
- blue horizontal-branch stars (STAR_BHB)
- both dwarf and giant carbon stars (STAR_CARBON)
- brown dwarfs (STAR_BROWN_DWARF) – this is the only tiled sample of stars
- low-luminosity subdwarfs (STAR_SUB_DWARF)
- cataclysmic variables (STAR_CATY_VAR)
- red dwarfs (STAR_RED_DWARF)
- hot white dwarfs (STAR_WHITE_DWARF)
- central stars of planetary nebulae (STAR_PN)
For more information on these, please see SEGUE Target Selection.
ROSAT targeting is described in Anderson, S., et al. 2003, AJ, 126, 2209 SDSS objects are positionally matched against X-ray sources from the ROSAT All-Sky Survey (RASS; Voges et al. 1999), and SDSS objects within the RASS error circles (commonly 10-20 arcsec) are targeted using algorithms tuned to select likely optical counterparts to the X-ray sources. Objects are targeted which:
- are also radio sources (ROSAT_A)
- have SDSS colors of AGNs or quasars (ROSAT_B)
- fall in a broad, intermediate category that includes stars that are bright, moderately blue, or both (ROSAT_C)
- are otherwise bright enough for SDSS spectroscopy (ROSAT_D)
Objects are flagged ROSAT_E if they fall within the RASS error circle but are either too faint or too bright for SDSS spectroscopy.
This is an open category of targets whose selection criteria may change as different regions of parameter space are explored. These consist of:
- objects lying outside the stellar locus in color space (SERENDIP_RED, SERENDIP_BLUE, SERENDIP_DISTANT)
- objects coincident with FIRST sources but fainter than the equivalent in quasar target selection; also not restricted to point sources (SERENDIP_FIRST)
- hand-selected targets (SERENDIP_MANUAL)
Target Selection References
- Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Early Data Release, Stoughton, C., et al. 2002, AJ, 123, 485
- Spectroscopic Target Selection in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: The Main Galaxy Sample, Strauss, M., et al. 2002, AJ, 124, 1810
- Spectroscopic Target Selection for the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: The Luminous Red Galaxy Sample, Eisenstein, D., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 2267
- Spectroscopic Target Selection in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: The Quasar Sample, Richards, G., et al. 2002, 123, 2945
- A Large, Uniform Sample of X-Ray-Emitting AGNs: Selection Approach and an Initial Catalog from the ROSAT All-Sky and Sloan Digital Sky Surveys, Anderson, S., et al. 2003, AJ, 126, 2209